Can we trust them with our writing? Whenever I want feedback on my writing, I have to show it to someone who cares. Someone who will read and interpret it in their own way and tell me what worked for them or where it loses them. While I think AI hasn’t reached up to that point yet, its input seems to be a helpful tool…to an extent.
However, there’s no authentic connection on that other side and I think that’s too important to let go of. The articles mentions, “But when a computer ends up changing what the writer set out to achieve, writers may start to wonder whether their vision is getting muddied by an entity that lacks any experience with the real world.“
That experience and emotion is just as important in collaboration as it is in the writing process itself, in my opinion. It’s the best (and worst) part of being human. I want my work to connect with people who resonate with words I put out and, if some of those words are AI-generated, how do I know whether or not they give off the authenticity I strive for?
Towards the end, they discuss the eye of the beholder aka the reader. Again, going back to the importance of connection, the reader and the writer are truly the only entities who are able to detect what is derived from genuine emotion versus what is artificially produced. That line may be blurred as AI improves but, as long as the intention of the writer is still visible, that human connection remains irreplaceable.