Category Archives: student blogs

A.I., The New Age of Technology

Photo by Pierre Plante

In the beginning, humanity has prospered off the structure of writing. During the time of the Egyptian and the Assyrian empire, they utilize pictographs. Pictographs are symbols that were used in order to communicate and pass on messages using symbols. Often many times these were used, especially in biblical times, in order to establish a deeper connection towards those of an higher power. Back then, there was an emphasis on the use of technology and civilization prospered through trades and treaties.

In today’s time, technology has been at constant high, with how much it’s effected the economy. There’s not a single place where technology is being used in, and how it influenced people. Tech companies such as Samsung, Apple, Sprint play a big role in the subject of families and now are even making a impact with subjects like politics and daily news. Donald Trump utilized twitter as a means of communication when establishing major announcements back during his presidency (2016-2020) and would make posts on there which would highlight the current state of the nation. In today’s time, you’re more likely to hear news online first through social media apps such as Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, etc than your traditional newspaper. Now, almost everything is being conducted through an online database.

How might this affect today’s literature?

Photo by Helen Ebach

Writing has always been a staple towards the society around and how we interact with each. At an early age, we are exposed towards words and interpretations in order to mold us into the people we are today. Traditionally, we have always used to literature as a way of convey our emotions and feelings and implementing our ideals and beliefs onto a sheet of paper. With the release of ChatGPT in late November, now it questions the definition of “voice” in writing. ChatGPT main function is their use of database, one could type a prompt and the A.I. could generate a prompt in the matter of seconds and come up with a response that meets the person’s demands. Many writers have play tested it, seeing if it could be able to generate a poem or a short novelty piece. The results were phenomenal as the feedback often met or exceeded their expectations.

However, there has been speculation upon these findings. Many, especially teachers and faculty, are worried with the production of this A.I. system how it will affect our way of thinking. Many high school students have experimented with this A.I system and have been using this as a way of generating essays for their classes. This in turn, have led teachers to have to change their instruction in order to accommodate for ChatGPT.

Can ChatGPT have Voice?

Voice in writing is absolutely the writer’s fingerprint on paper. But, it’s also not that easy. I’ve come to terms with the fact that there is no definition to voice in writing. It’s always tone, style, or word choice, but no one knows how to put that into one word so we chose “voice” because it’s something distinct like someone’s voice, so close enough right?

Well no, there’s still a slight difference. People have the ability to manipulate their audible voice (if you’re like me, depends on who you’re talking to), while a writer’s voice has more of a gravitational pull on the writer. It’s almost inseparable to the writer, once they find it. No matter what genre of writing, it’s bound to show itself in some form.

Using ChatGPT in class last week didn’t freak me out the way I thought it would because it was kind of a Google response to our question, but I’m sure that’s just the start of it. The main difference, as I stated in class, was that I wrote my differences down in the form of a letter to someone. There was a lot of ‘you’ because I feel like the college experience is very self-guided compared to high school.

I’ve mentioned it in my last blog, but connection is important to me when I write. So, naturally, it makes sense to write to an invisible someone for me.

James McBride Question: Do you think ChatGPT would be able to emulate the theme of ‘common humanity’ you explore in your novels?

Un poco de todo

About Chat GPT vs what I wrote

About James McBride

Maybe I got a tear or two while reading James McBride for many reasons. Reading about racism is complex for me, because I grew up in a country full of minorities, the only ones who think they are superior are those with “money” and these are of all races; Also, I consider that I speak from the “privilege” I have not felt in my flesh what it is that someone rejects me because of my skin color, only my siblings for playing, because I have lighter skin than them, but I am in a middle point between indigenous and mestizo. It’s essential to recognize the value of words, what they cause, and how we can use them to help. It is also lovely to see how communities are open to helping others, giving food if they need it, and being there as support when institutions have turned their backs. Reading about how the neighbors brought food reminded me of my house in December, all the neighbors closed the streets, shared food, and ate as if we were a family, I also remember when my parents left and left my brother Rafael and me alone being children, I remember the neighbor in front taking us pots with soup and looking out the window in case we needed something. Kindness changes and forms a precedent in the human being. In Colombia, we often say, this is the country where many are born, but just a few survive, lack of opportunities, delinquency, drug addiction, and many more problems lead young people to have to look for other means to cope with their lives, so I felt very familiar, I studied in a public school and it with people who were in gangs,  That they carried weapons inside the school, who sold drugs that I had never heard in my life and the teachers tried to get them to look for other ways, but there came the point where they gave up, because in the same way, when they finished school they could not continue their studies, because there were no opportunities.

We are all good, maybe deep down, but that must be explored, worked on, and exposed, kindness changes live, and opportunities too.

Importance of voice

i spent a lot of the time in my head. my inner monologue could rival prince hamlet. so when i write my thoughts, and emotions pour out so much it hard NOT to see my voice. In my writing it is quintessential that every word flows into the next, like a paper airplane through the the air, straight & to the point yet impactful, or calmingly guiding you to the end goal like floating on a river feeling every molecule of water connect with your being.

High school vs College

I wrote that high school was a prison with walls made of rules and guidelines that must be followed obediently, while everyone is looking at you; its a factory line implanting information hour after hour to spit out obedient robots into the world.

College, on the other hand, feels like freedom regained (thanks Milton for the inspiration). Yes there are still deadline and guidelines that we are taught, but we’re told to go and find the answer. Find the answers other have found and compare them to yours.

“you’re given the reins to your own education/knowledge”

Me

I don’t recall what ChatGPT said but I’m sure I can recreate it instantly. The answer it gave last Thursday is the same as today, and it will be the same until education changes fundamentally.
That’s the one major importance…the fact that if you ask me this question next month the same meaning will be there but it wont be express exactly the same. my voice, like the wind, ever dependent on varying areas of pressure, changes and moves in different directions. Some thing this AI could never hope (if it could ever be programed to hope, hope is the epitome of human emotions) to mimic me.

Mr. McBride I used to sell your books.

That may sound like I was walking the streets, selling books to anyone interested in a lil knowledge trip… but I used to work at a bookstore [it’s commonly known, its name a homage to farm life and nobility]. One of my daily tasks was to access the company’s HUB of upcoming books and bestsellers. When Deacon King Kong was released i read its synopses and did my duty, selling copies with vague understandings of what was actually written. Call me cynical, but not much is needed for a 10 min max interaction with a customer who needs to be persuaded one way or another.

Mr.Mcbride you said that being cynical creates negative work and one who is cynical cannot be a creative writer. Does this you mean you see less value in cynical works regardless of their outcomes?

I personally find cynicism to be a great way to prompt the philosophical question… why?

Who is James McBride and what does he do?

James McBride is a 65-year-old Black American writer and musician. His story is that he grew up in a housing project with eleven siblings and his white Jewish mother. “‘Emphasize The Positive’: James McBride On The Kindness That Shaped Him” is a short yet insightful view into what this man is about. In this, he tells the story of his childhood growing up in a community where people came together and created a sense of being in a village. This life story of his is the major influence and inspiration for his novel ‘Deacon King Kong’, with the setting being a housing project similar to his childhood one.

James McBride’s story is one that is unfortunately not unique to him. Many black people in America have had to grow up in poverty due to racism and capitalism. Those in poverty, of working class, etc., haven’t had the privilege of living in a normal sized house that was fresh and clean, wasn’t filled to the brim with lead, didn’t cost too much, and that they could afford. There is something to be said about how James was able to grow up in a black community despite his black dad dying before his birth and him being predominantly raised by his white mother. About how his mother, despite being white, was welcomed into the community and treated as one of their own.

“There was an innocence to that period. And the reason why I use that word was because when white people talk about the ’60s and the Beatles, they always talk about the innocence as if innocence didn’t exist in black America.” He sums it up perfectly. With the assassinations of MLK JR. and Malcolm X, the civil rights movement took a huge moral hit, and the lack of racial equity and equality the existed already means that white people were going to view black people in much more racist ways. James’s own mother, despite not talking about her whiteness with her son, did make sure that he did good because she knew that people would view him through the lens of him being a black boy. Blackness affects everything we do no matter what, and in a racist society of the 70s, it was a serious problem if a black child was caught making even a minor mistake.

Some questions I have after listening to the 28 min podcast and reading the article pertains to his sentences on the police and his comments about how we in the present should deal with the lingering statues of confederates. In the article, which was published on March 9th 2020, he states his belief that the narrative that dehumanizes policemen is dangerous. He says that most cops are good, they aren’t paid well, and that they aren’t respected or treated well. Which, as another black person in America, I cannot agree with this in good taste at all. Police are one of the most powerful individuals in this state. Out of all legal forces, I can’t think of one that is more respected, more well paid/financed, and more well off than the police. Just in the last few years they’ve been given whose knows how much money as a department alone. According to this page on statistica.com and this police budget breakdown system on costofpolice.org, we can see that the US spends more money on policing than it does on overall community resources. And considering that Cop City is officially a thing, I definitely don’t think caring about the humanity of police of all people is a constructive focus. One thing that I agree with James on is that we should focus on education for children. Free and accessible education for children brings them up properly and influences them to pursue progressive and better opportunities.

I am also a little, for a lack of a better word, confused and weirded out over how he refers to Mary Chestnut, the wife of a confederate commander. She as a white person who married a confederate and had black servants in the household is referred to by James McBride as a good person in the podcast. While it’s one thing for her to be referred to as an interesting person, no one that takes part in any form of white supremacy, even simply by marrying a white supremacist, is anywhere close to being a good person. I also listened to him talk about how he never thought much about the confederate statues earlier in life. He said that he and others just walked past confederate flags and the people holding them up. I wonder just how much the political and social environment he was raised in socialized them to see these things as just something to accept. I always found it important to analyze and learn exactly why these things are allowed to be waved around in society, why is it acceptable in an nation of “freedom and the brave” to openly celebrate white supremacy and chattel slavery and why should we just simply walk by it and not fight against it completely?

Learning about James McBride was an interesting and eye-opening experience. It was important for me to learn about a black musician’s/writer’s journey in life and what he finds important. Looking at his observations and comments, I see what he finds important and what he has grown to believe over time. And while I find him an interesting person, it is obvious that he is from an older generation, and that this fact has a lot to do with what he finds important and what he believes in. I believe that what he has learned from in his life and how that is reflected in these two interviews can teach us what a lot of people can share and what a lot of people still need to learn about.

JAMES MCBRIDE

While reading “Emphasize The Positive” I found a lot of things interesting about this article. From where he grew up, to how he grew up and his outlook on certain things.

What stood out to me the most was his novel Deacon King Kong. McBride making the main character a good cop in my opinion may have caused those of the same race confusion as to why McBride chose to make the police officer the “good guy”. Over the past years, there has been so many negative things happening between police officers and African Americans. Although there Amy be some people that believe that all police officers are ‘bad guys’ that isn’t true.

McBride states, “Most cops are good people. They’re not paid well enough. They’re not respected enough”, I believe this statement to be very true. There are many police officers that do what is right, they protect and serve just as they are supposed to do. There is so much light shining on the police officers that are not protecting a serving but using their “power” to abuse. I think McBride making the character “the good guy” helps people remember that there are good police officers that are protecting and serving their communities the way they are intended to.

Questions for James McBride:

  1. At what point in your life did you realize writing was something you wanted to dive into?
  2. Have you received negative comments about making the police officer in your story the ‘good guy’?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Human Touch in Writing

Photo by Hussein Abdullah on Unsplash


The rise of AI tools, specifically OpenAI’s Chat GPT chatbot, has led to the development of various writing-assistive technologies, such as autocompleting sentences and grammar checkers, making the writing process faster and more efficient. However, there is concern that the increased reliance on these tools may negatively affect a writer’s voice, which is the unique personality and style that sets a writer’s work apart. While AI tools can certainly make the writing process effortless, they shouldn’t be looked upon as a replacement for a writer’s voice and creative input.

After our discussion last week about the importance of voice in writing, I can say that a downside of AI tools is their lack of comprehension of the material they generate. Artificial intelligence has mastered the technical aspects of language, such as syntax, but has no understanding of meaning and voice in writing. It also cannot link concepts with personal experiences and for humans, language becomes functional when we connect words with context.

Voice is a crucial aspect of writing as it represents the unique perspective, style, and tone. It is the personality that the writer imbues into the text, making it distinct from other works. Voice can convey emotions, opinions, and attitudes, which can impact a reader’s experience of the text. It can also help to establish a connection between the writer and the reader, creating a sense of intimacy and engagement. The voice in writing establishes the author’s credibility, builds trust, and shapes the reader’s perception of the author’s message.

Voice is what ultimately makes writing personal, memorable, and impactful.

“Don’t Lose Sight of Who Dreams Are For.”

Voice of writing to me has always been – the point! This could come through in the literal message that one is conveying through the written form, the musical nature that transmits from letters to the mind of the reader – whatever! It’s the point, and anyone who disagrees and downplays the abstract force that is any artistic medium, well, they need to either “fix your heart or die.”

It is everything.

What I noticed about the whole high school vs. college exercise from last week’s class is that I really love people, one’s that I think are people. The sort of people that can engage me as moving vessels of connectivity, rather than intentioned fronts putting on a face. I hate those, I suppose some can call them people, but I call them mere vessels. No words that I can throw can fill them up, because they are not quite THERE yet, y’dig? They are prepubescent, perhaps saccharine on the outside – maybe even initially pleasant, but they’re not their own selves.

They are no selves. Empty shells with edgy words.

At least, that’s how I’d probably go about typing this blog if it were Spring 2016, and I was my 2016-self, back when I was in high school. I still relate to that kid very much, he is still me. He just has grown encrusted with many experiential, honest, beautiful, rigid, scarred, and even unexpected layers. These may come in the form of seconds, minutes, days – whatever!

Can a ChatGPT have such layers? Can AI develop such layers?

The answers that the ChatGPT produced in class had nothing. They, with great justice to all of the experiential layers that I and PEOPLE have, are nothing. That collective of words displayed on-screen, via-HDMI or whatever, were not words. They were CENSORSHIP, absence, and death. Of what? Beauty, life, experience.

They were … the deathknell of the muse.

James McBride Questions:

  1. What is your response to my claim that there is an inherit power dynamic between civilian and cop that is destructive to the civilian?
  2. You have been quoted stating the following: “you can’t be a creative person, if you are so cynical about the world” and “you have to emphasize the positive, otherwise, why write about people at all?” Do you not find these ideas restrictive to creativity itself, and exclusionary of the experiences and perspectives of cynical individuals. To what extent were your words expressed hyperbolically, and can you further clarify how cynicism is uncreative?

James McBride

After reading “‘Emphasize The Positive’: James McBride On The Kindness That Shaped Him” by Terry Gross and listening to The Quarantine Tapes: 092 James McBride (08.05.20) from Dublab, I learned a lot about James McBride’s childhood and his recent life updates from 2020.

In The Quarantine Tapes, McBride made a point to say that we should learn the history of who the statues are so that we can learn from them and correct them in the future. And I agree with that. Each time a confederate statue is torn down, part of me agrees with it, but the academic part of me is curious as to who the person was and why people are so upset. We don’t learn about half of these people in schools and what little we do learn is often whitewashed.

A point that McBride made in ‘Emphasize the Positive’ was that he depicted the police in a positive way. McBride had a positive experience as a child where his sister got lost at a crowded event and came out of the crowd with a White police officer. Growing up, I had a family member that was a local police officer and he often let my younger brother and I play with his police car as if it were a toy. (Really fun memories there.) I understand that not all police officers are bad, but when all you see is the bad, it’s hard to believe anything else.

From this, I have two questions:

  • What does McBride think of the police now? Or at least the way we see the police depicted on the news now.
  • How can we be sure we actually learn about the people confederate statues are made of? Yes, we can research, but oftentimes schools are the only place we have immediate constant access to and are where we first hear about them.

Hello!

They say life is like a mystery.

Almost like a tree growing from a mustard seed.

But I believe there’s more to life than what’s to come.

As much as the human mind denies it, calling it dumb.

Before we get into detail, how about we take it slow.

As I extend my greeting with a simple hello.